The art of solving problems: comparing the similarities and differences

Abstract

This project compared and contrasted three popular, cognitive creative problem solving methods – Synectics, Creative Problem Solving (CPS) and Lateral Thinking. A qualitative research design compared each method across focused and differentiated dimensions of analysis. The dimensions of analysis were philosophical, theoretical, structural, functional and efficacy. This study was conducted in order to provide an objective base of data that clearly indicates the strengths and weaknesses of each method in relation to each dimension of analysis. Specific criteria, organized within each dimension of analysis, were used to break-down each method and then to make comparisons across. Tomado del texto original Fecha de reseña: 18/10/2016